Prohibitions and Exceptions
The VPPA places strict limitations on the disclosure of PII by video service providers but includes specific exceptions:
- Prohibitions:
-
- Providers are prohibited from knowingly sharing a consumer’s PII without their written consent.
- Permissible Disclosures:
-
- To the consumer themselves.
- With the consumer’s written consent.
- In response to a federal or state warrant, grand jury subpoena, or court order.
- As part of standard business operations.
- Disclosures limited to names and addresses, provided consumers have been given the opportunity to opt out.
Consumer Rights and Remedies
The VPPA grants consumers significant protections and avenues for recourse in cases of violations:
The VPPA grants consumers significant protections and avenues for recourse in cases of violations:
- Legal Rights:
-
- Consumers can initiate civil actions against service providers for breaches of the VPPA.
- Available Remedies:
-
- Liquidated damages of up to $2,500 per violation.
- Actual damages if greater than the statutory amount.
- Punitive damages for egregious violations.
- Reasonable attorney fees and equitable relief to address privacy breaches.
Recent Litigation and Emerging Trends
The rise of online video platforms and the use of data tracking technologies have extended the scope of the VPPA to address modern privacy challenges:
The rise of online video platforms and the use of data tracking technologies have extended the scope of the VPPA to address modern privacy challenges:
- Expansion to Online Videos:
-
- Technologies such as Meta Pixel and Google Analytics have been implicated in lawsuits alleging unauthorized sharing of video-watching data without user consent.
- Notable Legal Cases:
- Southern District of New York Case:
-
- A media company faced allegations for disclosing video-watching history through Meta Pixel. The court allowed the case to proceed, emphasizing the applicability of the VPPA in digital contexts.
- Salazar Decision:
-
- The Second Circuit Court clarified the definition of a consumer under the VPPA, broadening its scope and allowing more individuals to bring claims.
- Carrol v. General Mills, Inc.:
-
- Highlighted VPPA’s relevance to mobile apps. The case involved allegations that General Mills used tracking technology to disclose video-watching data without consumer consent.
Class Action Lawsuits and Business Impact
- Since 2022, over 100 class action lawsuits have been filed under the VPPA, targeting companies that allegedly disclose PII related to video content without proper consent.
- These lawsuits often seek statutory damages, posing significant financial and reputational risks to businesses operating in the online video space.
Digital Era Implications
The VPPA, originally enacted to protect physical video rental records, now addresses critical privacy concerns in the era of streaming and digital content. It emphasizes the need for companies to comply with privacy standards, ensuring consumers’ personal viewing habits remain confidential in an increasingly connected world.
The VPPA, originally enacted to protect physical video rental records, now addresses critical privacy concerns in the era of streaming and digital content. It emphasizes the need for companies to comply with privacy standards, ensuring consumers’ personal viewing habits remain confidential in an increasingly connected world.
