Evidence built for regulators, courts, and opposing counsel.

What counsel actually receives.

A banner screenshot by itself does not establish which technologies loaded, when they loaded, what choices the visitor made, or whether the website honored those choices. Captain Compliance helps create a fuller technical record through documented scans, technology inventories, configuration histories, consent records, behavior testing, timestamped findings, screenshots, audit logs, remediation records and continuous monitoring. Depending on the engagement, counsel may receive a technical privacy audit report, technology and tracker inventory, consent behavior test results, tag and pixel findings, available consent records, configuration documentation, timestamped screenshots, a remediation summary, change history, automatically generated reports, a technical declaration or affidavit, expert-witness assistance, deposition support and technical assistance with discovery responses. An honest limitation on historical evidence. A present-day audit cannot automatically reconstruct exactly how a website operated before Captain Compliance was engaged. Historical conclusions depend on the records, logs, source code, tag-manager versions, archived pages, vendor data, screenshots and other evidence that remain available. We can preserve evidence and monitor website behavior prospectively after engagement, in accordance with counsel’s instructions — we cannot retroactively preserve evidence that no longer exists. From investigation through testimony. Depending on the engagement and the qualifications required, Captain Compliance can assist with technical declarations, affidavits, discovery responses, document identification, technical explanations for pleadings or negotiations, deposition preparation and testimony, expert-witness support, demonstrations of consent behavior, explanation of scan findings and configurations, and coordination with separately retained testifying experts. Whether a Captain Compliance professional serves as a fact witness, consulting expert, testifying expert or technical support resource must be determined for the particular engagement. What we do not promise. We do not promise automatic admissibility, a guaranteed litigation result, regulator acceptance, an unbroken chain of custody unless actually established, reconstruction of unavailable historical evidence, or that no expert challenge will occur. The admissibility, discoverability, privilege, weight and legal significance of technical evidence depend on the circumstances and are determined by counsel and the applicable tribunal, and courts independently decide whether expert testimony and opinions are admissible.