CIPA · ECPA · VPPA · pixel & tracker claims
Reduce website privacy lawsuit risk before a demand letter arrives.
Captain Compliance finds the pixels, cookies, session-replay tools, chat technologies, video trackers and third-party scripts operating on your website — then helps control when they load, document consent and keep privacy guardrails in place.
Book My Privacy Risk DemoSee What We Protect Against
Continuous scanningConsent enforcementAudit-ready evidenceSuperhuman support
Qualifying deployments can also be backed by Compliance Shield — Captain Compliance’s written litigation guarantee, subject to applicable terms.
See what your website is actually sending.
Book a personalized walkthrough and see how Captain Compliance identifies tracking risks, enforces privacy choices and preserves the evidence behind every consent decision.
Thanks for submitting the form.
No obligation. We will use your information to schedule and personalize the requested demonstration. See our Privacy Notice.
// Findings identify technical behavior and potential risk. They do not establish that a law has been violated.
The contrarian message
Your banner records a choice. Does your code actually follow it?
Many businesses assume that displaying a cookie banner resolves their website privacy risk. But the banner is only the interface. The underlying code determines which pixels fire, which vendors receive data, whether a rejection is honored, and whether the organization can prove what happened later.
What the banner says
Captain Compliance
enforcement layer
What the website does
Technologies drawing claims
Find the technologies appearing in privacy claims and demand letters.
Advertising pixels
Identify Meta, TikTok, Google, LinkedIn and other advertising technologies and observe when they load.
Session replay
Detect tools capable of recording clicks, scrolling, keystrokes, form interaction and visitor behavior.
Chat and chatbots
Surface third-party chat technologies and transmissions challenged under interception and wiretapping theories.
Video tracking
Identify video players, viewing events, advertising pixels and data combinations that may require VPPA review.
Cookies and identifiers
Inventory first-party cookies, third-party cookies, advertising IDs, device identifiers and related tracking technologies.
Consent failures
Test whether designated technologies load before consent, remain active after rejection, or ignore applicable opt-out signals.
// The presence of a technology does not automatically establish a legal violation. Risk depends on configuration, consent, disclosure, data transmitted, visitor relationship, jurisdiction and controlling law.
The lawsuit-risk landscape
One website. Multiple theories of liability.
From scan to enforcement
See it. Stop it. Prove it.
1 · See it
- ·Cookies
- ·Pixels
- ·Trackers
- ·Session replay
- ·Chat
- ·Embedded video
- ·Third-party requests
- ·Consent drift
- ·Unknown technologies
2 · Stop it
- ·Pre-consent blocking
- ·Accept, reject and customize choices
- ·Regional configurations
- ·Global Privacy Control
- ·Vendor and purpose controls
- ·Tag-manager coordination
- ·Supported server-side signals
- ·Preference updates
3 · Prove it
- ·Consent timestamp
- ·Jurisdiction
- ·Applicable banner
- ·Notice version
- ·Visitor choice
- ·Technologies allowed
- ·Technologies blocked
- ·GPC status
- ·Preference changes
- ·Configuration history
The comparison
A privacy interface is not the same as privacy enforcement.
| Capability | A basic banner | Captain Compliance |
|---|---|---|
| Displays a consent interface | Yes | Yes |
| Continuously discovers trackers | Limited or periodic | Continuous scanning |
| Tests accept and reject behavior | Not usually | Yes |
| Blocks designated technologies | Configuration-dependent | Enforceable controls |
| Recognizes applicable privacy signals | Varies | Regional signal handling |
| Maintains detailed evidence | Basic logs | Consent receipts and configuration history |
| Monitors changes | Limited | Ongoing drift detection |
| Human implementation support | Limited | Superhuman support |
| Litigation guarantee | No | Compliance Shield for qualifying deployments |
// A general comparison against a banner-only implementation. Capabilities vary between platforms and configurations.
Compliance Shield
Software protection backed by a written guarantee.
Technology should do more than generate reports. For qualifying deployments, Compliance Shield backs Captain Compliance’s configured privacy controls with defined litigation support under a written agreement.
Approved implementationContinuous monitoringConsent and configuration evidenceTechnical claim investigationRapid-response supportDefined protection for qualifying claims
// Compliance Shield is subject to eligibility requirements, approved configurations, customer obligations, limitations, exclusions and the applicable written agreement.
Superhuman support
When the risk is real, support cannot be a ticket number.
Captain Compliance works with privacy, legal, marketing and engineering teams to configure controls, investigate tracking behavior, correct implementation problems, preserve evidence and respond when allegations arise.
Implementation
Hands-on assistance configuring the platform around the organization’s website, technologies and privacy requirements.
Monitoring
Ongoing visibility into new vendors, trackers, configuration changes and consent drift.
Remediation
Practical assistance correcting tag behavior, blocking failures, disclosures and preference workflows.
Claim response
Technical evidence and responsive support when a privacy demand or allegation arrives.
Privacy software built for real-world risk, backed by superhuman support.
Who we protect
Built for any organization with a website, visitors and third-party technology.
eCommerce and retailHealthcare and telehealthPublishers and mediaSaaS and technologyFinancial servicesProfessional servicesConsumer brandsAgencies and multi-property operatorsEnterprise organizationsLegal and privacy teams
What happens in the demo
A product demo built around your website.
Questions
Website privacy risk, answered plainly.
What types of website technologies does Captain Compliance detect?
Cookies, advertising pixels, analytics, session-replay tools, chat and chatbot services, embedded video players, third-party domains and requests, and technologies that appear or change after launch.
Does having a cookie banner protect a business from privacy lawsuits?
Not on its own. A banner records a choice; it does not prevent a transmission unless the underlying technologies are actually held until the required condition is met. Many claims involve sites that displayed a banner while tags fired regardless.
Can Captain Compliance prevent pixels from firing before consent?
Yes. Designated technologies can be blocked from loading or transmitting until the configured consent condition is satisfied, per region and per technology.
What happens when a visitor rejects tracking?
Designated nonessential technologies are prevented from operating, the rejection is recorded with a timestamp and applicable configuration, and the choice is applied on subsequent visits according to your setup.
Does Captain Compliance recognize Global Privacy Control?
Yes. GPC signals can be detected and the configured opt-out behavior applied according to your regional settings and applicable requirements.
What are consent receipts?
A record of what a visitor was shown and chose — timestamp, jurisdiction, banner and notice version, the choice itself, which technologies were allowed or blocked, GPC status and later preference changes. This is the evidence that matters if practices are ever questioned.
Can Captain Compliance help after a demand letter arrives?
Yes. Our team can help identify the technologies involved, preserve technical evidence and consent records, and support your counsel with findings. Captain Compliance does not provide legal representation or advice.
What is Compliance Shield?
Defined litigation support for qualifying deployments under a separate written agreement, available when Captain Compliance technology is properly deployed and maintained. Eligibility, obligations, limitations and exclusions are governed by that agreement.
Does Captain Compliance replace legal counsel?
No. We provide privacy technology, implementation and technical support. Whether a practice is lawful is fact-specific and requires qualified counsel.
How quickly can Captain Compliance be implemented?
It depends on scope and technical environment — number of properties, tag-manager setup, server-side components and regional requirements. A straightforward single-site deployment is fast; complex multi-property stacks are scoped individually.
Can Captain Compliance work with our tag manager and existing website?
Yes. Consent states can be coordinated with Google Tag Manager and other supported deployment workflows, alongside direct tag and supported server-side configurations.
What will I see during the demo?
A walkthrough built around your actual public website — what technologies we observe, how consent behaves under accept, reject and GPC, and how enforcement and evidence would apply to your setup.
See your website the way a plaintiff’s expert might
Find the tracking risk before a demand letter does.
Book a personalized demonstration to see how Captain Compliance discovers website technologies, enforces privacy choices, preserves evidence and helps reduce litigation exposure.
Already received a demand letter? Tell us here →
Captain Compliance provides privacy technology, implementation and support. It does not provide legal advice and cannot guarantee that no claim or allegation will be made. Legal requirements and claims are fact-specific.