Most plaintiff firms pick a home jurisdiction and work it. Siri & Glimstad LLP operates differently. The firm files privacy class actions in California federal court, New York federal court,
Florida is not California. That observation matters in digital privacy litigation because plaintiff firms, compliance officers, and corporate counsel have spent the last several years calibrating their exposure models around
Illinois has produced more significant privacy class action settlements than any other state in the country. That is not an accident. It is the direct result of a single statute
Detroit is not the first city that comes to mind when compliance officers think about digital privacy litigation risk. California dominates that conversation, and for good reason — CIPA wiretapping
Bailey & Glasser LLP is one of the main law firms that businesses are dreading hearing from when it comes to data privacy litigation, particularly in cases involving data interception,
Every week we break down a new law firm that we find that has entered into the data privacy litigation space. It’s become a multi-million-dollar arena where older statutes are
We provide a data subject request automation software to ensure compliance with the state data broker laws. Data brokers — companies that collect, compile, and sell personal information about individuals
If your company received a CIPA lawsuit or demand letter from Todd M. Friedman or another California consumer privacy firm, treat it as both a litigation event and a website
The Firm That Was Suing Over Cookies Before Most Companies Had a Privacy Policy Scott Kamber started litigating internet tracking when “tracking” meant dial-up cookies and banner ad networks. Two
Most companies treat privacy as a cost center. A compliance obligation. Something the legal team handles, funded reluctantly, measured by whether anything went wrong. That framing is outdated — and