If you’d like to watch a video fully explaining Digital Fingerprinting and Cookieless Targeted Advertising you can watch our educational video here.
Google used to dismiss fingerprinting and under pressure from smart tv advertising Google has reversed it’s stance on banning fingerprinting and now its no longer explicitly prohibited. They have taken other steps with privacy enhancing technologies and the UK’s ICO spoke out against this shortly after with the ICO threatening to act if it’s abused. So now onto the meat and explanation all about fingerprinting and cookieless targeting advertising.
The Era of Digital Fingerprinting: Cookieless Targeted Advertising
By all accounts, the internet as we know it is undergoing a seismic shift and this is not AI based but rather a privacy shift. For years, the digital advertising ecosystem thrived on a simple, if invasive, tool: the cookie (which we help manage to keep business owners compliant). These tiny snippets of code have the ability to track your every click, purchase, and idle scroll, building intricate profiles that advertisers could tap into with surgical precision. Doing so unchecked and without either disclosure or consent has led to litigation from law firms like Swigart Law in California as well as Scott Ferrel’s Pacific Trial Attorneys. The cookie’s reign is crumbling though or so we thought when Google said they were deprecating it before rolling back that idea.
For a visual example see below a scan showcasing a report from: amiunique.org/fingerprint
There was talk about Apple’s Safari and Mozilla’s Firefox wanting to curtail third-party cookies, and Google’s Chrome—the last major holdout—had previously promised to phase them out as we mentioned above. In their place, a new and subtler beast has emerged: digital fingerprinting. It’s cookieless, it’s relentless, and it’s raising urgent questions about privacy in an age when regulators are scrambling to keep up.
The premise is deceptively simple. Digital fingerprinting doesn’t rely on cookies or any stored identifier. Instead, it assembles a unique portrait of you based on the digital breadcrumbs you leave behind—your device’s screen resolution, operating system, browser version, IP address, even the way your fonts render. Combine these traits, and you’ve got a fingerprint as distinctive as the whorls on your thumb. Advertisers love it because it’s harder to block than cookies. Privacy advocates hate it for the same reason. Somewhere in the middle, lawmakers in Europe and beyond are trying to figure out whether this shadowy practice complies with the sprawling web of rules meant to protect us online with the ICO in the UK already saying they will take action.
Take Sarah, a 34-year-old graphic designer from Brooklyn. Last month, she browsed a site for hiking boots on her iPhone. She didn’t log in, didn’t add anything to her cart—just looked. Two hours later, ads for those exact boots followed her to a news site, then an unrelated blog. No cookies were involved; her device had been fingerprinted. “It felt creepy,” she told me over coffee in Williamsburg. “I get that ads are part of the internet, but this felt like someone was watching me over my shoulder.”
She’s not wrong to feel that way. A 2024 study by the Electronic Frontier Foundation found that fingerprinting scripts are now present on 40% of the top 10,000 websites, up from just 10% five years ago. Companies like Criteo and The Trade Desk, giants in the ad-tech world, have leaned hard into cookieless solutions, with fingerprinting at the core. Criteo’s “Commerce Media Platform” boasts of reaching consumers “without reliance on outdated identifiers,” while The Trade Desk’s Unified ID 2.0 pairs fingerprinting with other techniques to keep ads flowing. The result? A $600 billion digital ad industry that’s adapting faster than regulators can blink.
The Mechanics of a Shadowy Art
To understand fingerprinting, picture your device as a snowflake. No two are exactly alike. Your iPhone 14 running iOS 18.1 might have a Retina display set to 1170 x 2532 pixels, paired with a specific version of WebKit. Your timezone might hint you’re in Eastern Standard Time, and your language settings could reveal a preference for English (U.S.). Toss in your IP address, and a fingerprinting algorithm can peg you with startling accuracy—often over 90%, according to research from Princeton’s Web Transparency and Accountability Project.
Unlike cookies, which you can clear with a click, fingerprints regenerate every time you load a page. Blocking them is a game of whack-a-mole: Privacy-focused browsers like Brave can scramble some signals, but clever scripts adapt, finding new traits to latch onto. “It’s an arms race,” says Dr. Elena Martinez, a data privacy expert at Stanford. “The industry’s incentive is to keep identifying users, no matter the method.”
The numbers tell the story. Below is a graph based on data from Privacy Sandbox trackers and industry reports, showing the rise of fingerprinting as cookies fade:
The trend is clear: As cookies vanish, fingerprinting fills the void. But what does this mean for the laws meant to shield us?
Privacy Laws in the Crosshairs
Europe’s privacy framework, anchored by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the e-Privacy Directive, was built for a cookie-driven world. The GDPR, enacted in 2018, demands that companies get explicit consent before processing personal data—defined broadly as anything that can identify an individual. The e-Privacy Directive, often called the “cookie law,” zeroes in on electronic communications, requiring opt-in consent for tracking tools like cookies unless they’re strictly necessary (think login sessions, not ad targeting).
Fingerprinting, though, slips through the cracks. Because it doesn’t store data on your device like a cookie does, some argue it sidesteps the e-Privacy Directive’s scope. Others, including the French data protection authority (CNIL), disagree. In 2023, CNIL fined a mid-sized ad-tech firm €1.2 million for fingerprinting users without consent, ruling that the practice constituted “personal data processing” under GDPR. The firm’s defense—that no identifier was stored—fell flat. “If it identifies you, it’s personal data,” a CNIL spokesperson told me. “The method doesn’t matter.”
Across the Atlantic, the picture is murkier. The U.S. lacks a federal privacy law akin to GDPR, leaving a patchwork of state rules like California’s CCPA. Fingerprinting thrives here, largely unchecked. A 2024 lawsuit against Target, filed in California, alleges the retailer used fingerprinting to track users despite “Do Not Track” settings—a potential CCPA violation. The case is pending, but it’s a sign of battles to come.
Back in Europe, the proposed e-Privacy Regulation—meant to replace the 2002 Directive—has stalled since 2017, mired in debates over how to handle emerging tech. “Fingerprinting wasn’t on the radar when these laws were drafted,” says Marta Rossi, a Brussels-based privacy lawyer. “Regulators are playing catch-up, and companies know it.”
The Human Cost
For consumers, the stakes are personal. Consider Jamal, a 29-year-old nurse in London. After researching mental health resources online, he noticed ads for antidepressants shadowing him across the web. “I didn’t want anyone knowing that,” he says. “It’s not just about ads—it’s about what they assume about you.” Fingerprinting’s opacity makes it worse: Unlike cookies, there’s no pop-up asking for consent, no easy way to opt out.
Advocates argue the ad industry needs targeting to survive. “Free content isn’t free,” says Paul, a VP at an ad-tech startup. “If we can’t reach the right people, publishers collapse.” He’s got a point—digital ads fund much of the internet but the shift to fingerprinting feels like a bait-and-switch: Just as users gained tools to block cookies, the game changed.
Some companies are testing alternatives. Google’s Privacy Sandbox pitches “Federated Learning of Cohorts” (FLoC), grouping users by interest without individual tracking. It’s less invasive than fingerprinting, but uptake has been slow—advertisers crave precision. Apple’s SKAdNetwork offers another model, tying ads to anonymized device signals. Neither fully replaces the granular data fingerprinting provides.
Where Do We Go From Here With a Digital Fingerprinting World? What Are My Privacy Risks with Digital Fingerprinting?
The era of digital fingerprinting is here, and it’s not going anywhere soon. Regulators face a choice: Update laws to explicitly tackle it, or watch it erode the consent frameworks they’ve built and neither will move as fast as the tech companies do. The EU’s Data Protection Board hinted at action in a report last year, calling fingerprinting “a significant risk to fundamental rights.” Fines like CNIL’s may multiply, but enforcement lags behind innovation.
For now, users like Sarah and Jamal are left with unease—and few defenses. Browser extensions like uBlock Origin can help, but they’re not foolproof. “I just want to browse in peace,” Sarah says, sipping her latte. “Is that too much to ask?”
Maybe it is. The internet’s economics hinge on knowing us, and fingerprinting is the latest way to do it. As cookies fade into history, this cookieless future feels less like liberation and more like a new leash— subtler, stronger, and harder to shake. Lawmakers, technologists, and users alike will have to decide: Is this the privacy we’re willing to live with? The answer, like our fingerprints, may be uniquely ours.
If you want help with Fingerprinting compliance to ensure that your company and business is following data privacy requirements reach out for a demo below with one of our privacy and compliance superheroes.