Know what’s on your site before a plaintiff’s firm does
A free privacy audit shows which cookies, pixels and trackers are running — and which ones commonly appear in privacy claims.
If you’d like to watch a video fully explaining Digital Fingerprinting and Cookieless Targeted Advertising you can watch our educational video here.
Google used to dismiss fingerprinting and under pressure from smart tv advertising Google has reversed it’s stance on banning fingerprinting and now its no longer explicitly prohibited. They have taken other steps with privacy enhancing technologies and the UK’s ICO spoke out against this shortly after with the ICO threatening to act if it’s abused. So now onto the meat and explanation all about fingerprinting and cookieless targeting advertising.
The Era of Digital Fingerprinting: Cookieless Targeted Advertising
By all accounts, the internet as we know it is undergoing a seismic shift and this is not AI based but rather a privacy shift. For years, the digital advertising ecosystem thrived on a simple, if invasive, tool: the cookie (which we help manage to keep business owners compliant). These tiny snippets of code have the ability to track your every click, purchase, and idle scroll, building intricate profiles that advertisers could tap into with surgical precision. Doing so unchecked and without either disclosure or consent has led to litigation from law firms like Swigart Law in California as well as Scott Ferrel’s Pacific Trial Attorneys. The cookie’s reign is crumbling though or so we thought when Google said they were deprecating it before rolling back that idea.
For a visual example see below a scan showcasing a report from: amiunique.org/fingerprint

There was talk about Apple’s Safari and Mozilla’s Firefox wanting to curtail third-party cookies, and Google’s Chrome—the last major holdout—had previously promised to phase them out as we mentioned above. In their place, a new and subtler beast has emerged: digital fingerprinting. It’s cookieless, it’s relentless, and it’s raising urgent questions about privacy in an age when regulators are scrambling to keep up.
The premise is deceptively simple. Digital fingerprinting doesn’t rely on cookies or any stored identifier. Instead, it assembles a unique portrait of you based on the digital breadcrumbs you leave behind—your device’s screen resolution, operating system, browser version, IP address, even the way your fonts render. Combine these traits, and you’ve got a fingerprint as distinctive as the whorls on your thumb. Advertisers love it because it’s harder to block than cookies. Privacy advocates hate it for the same reason. Somewhere in the middle, lawmakers in Europe and beyond are trying to figure out whether this shadowy practice complies with the sprawling web of rules meant to protect us online with the ICO in the UK already saying they will take action.
Take Sarah, a 34-year-old graphic designer from Brooklyn. Last month, she browsed a site for hiking boots on her iPhone. She didn’t log in, didn’t add anything to her cart—just looked. Two hours later, ads for those exact boots followed her to a news site, then an unrelated blog. No cookies were involved; her device had been fingerprinted. “It felt creepy,” she told me over coffee in Williamsburg. “I get that ads are part of the internet, but this felt like someone was watching me over my shoulder.”
She’s not wrong to feel that way. A 2024 study by the Electronic Frontier Foundation found that fingerprinting scripts are now present on 40% of the top 10,000 websites, up from just 10% five years ago. Companies like Criteo and The Trade Desk, giants in the ad-tech world, have leaned hard into cookieless solutions, with fingerprinting at the core. Criteo’s “Commerce Media Platform” boasts of reaching consumers “without reliance on outdated identifiers,” while The Trade Desk’s Unified ID 2.0 pairs fingerprinting with other techniques to keep ads flowing. The result? A $600 billion digital ad industry that’s adapting faster than regulators can blink.
The Mechanics of a Shadowy Art
To understand fingerprinting, picture your device as a snowflake. No two are exactly alike. Your iPhone 14 running iOS 18.1 might have a Retina display set to 1170 x 2532 pixels, paired with a specific version of WebKit. Your timezone might hint you’re in Eastern Standard Time, and your language settings could reveal a preference for English (U.S.). Toss in your IP address, and a fingerprinting algorithm can peg you with startling accuracy—often over 90%, according to research from Princeton’s Web Transparency and Accountability Project.
Unlike cookies, which you can clear with a click, fingerprints regenerate every time you load a page. Blocking them is a game of whack-a-mole: Privacy-focused browsers like Brave can scramble some signals, but clever scripts adapt, finding new traits to latch onto. “It’s an arms race,” says Dr. Elena Martinez, a data privacy expert at Stanford. “The industry’s incentive is to keep identifying users, no matter the method.”
The numbers tell the story. Below is a graph based on data from Privacy Sandbox trackers and industry reports, showing the rise of fingerprinting as cookies fade:
Put this into practice
Turn privacy guidance into working controls.
Captain Compliance helps teams discover tracking technologies, enforce consent, manage privacy requests and document the evidence behind every decision.