While plaintiffs’ firms like Lynch Carpenter have built lucrative practices by pursuing companies over data breaches and privacy violations, a select group of elite defense firms has emerged on the opposite side of the courtroom firms that specialize in protecting the world’s most valuable technology companies from existential legal threats. Among them, Covington & Burling LLP stands apart as arguably the most formidable data privacy defense practice in the United States.
With over 100 lawyers dedicated to privacy and cybersecurity issues across global offices, Covington has become the go-to firm for technology giants facing their most consequential battles. From blocking government attempts to ban TikTok to securing dismissals for Microsoft and Apple in groundbreaking AI privacy cases, from defending Meta against thousands of social media addiction lawsuits to representing clients in multibillion-dollar antitrust matters, Covington’s privacy practice operates at the intersection of law, technology, and government power in ways that few firms can match.
Get a Free Privacy Audit to Understand Your Businesses Privacy Risks
A Practice Built on Government Expertise and Cutting-Edge Litigation
What distinguishes Covington from other privacy defense firms is its unique combination of deep government relationships, former high-level government attorneys, and expertise in handling novel legal questions at the frontiers of technology law. The firm doesn’t just defend privacy cases it shapes the legal frameworks that govern how privacy law applies to emerging technologies.
Chambers and Partners describes Covington as an “accomplished group of privacy and data security practitioners” that “provides dynamic, practical, real-world advice.” More telling is the consistent praise from market sources: “Covington’s group is one of the best one-stop shops for regulatory advice. It has a well-deserved reputation for excellence.”
The practice covers every substantive area of privacy and security: information technology, data security, financial privacy, health privacy, employment privacy, litigation, transactions, and regulatory compliance. With attorneys based in Washington, New York, San Francisco, London, Brussels, Frankfurt, Dubai, Johannesburg, and Beijing, the firm’s multilingual team handles the full spectrum of privacy and cybersecurity matters worldwide.
The Powerhouse Attorneys Behind Covington’s Privacy Defense
Covington’s privacy practice features an exceptional roster of attorneys who regularly handle the highest-stakes matters in the field. Understanding who these lawyers are and what they’ve accomplished provides insight into why the world’s largest technology companies consistently turn to Covington when facing their most serious legal threats.
Alexander Berengaut: The Government Litigator Taking on Executive Power
Alexander Berengaut, co-chair of Covington’s Government Litigation practice, has built a reputation as one of the nation’s most formidable litigators in cases involving novel exercises of government power against technology companies. His practice focuses on high-stakes disputes over data privacy, platform liability, artificial intelligence, and cybersecurity—often in cases where the government is wielding unprecedented authority.
For over four years, Berengaut has served as lead counsel to TikTok in defending against legal challenges to its operations in the United States. In 2020, he delivered the winning argument that blocked a nationwide ban of the app just hours before it was set to take effect, securing a preliminary injunction against President Trump’s executive order. The case centered on data privacy concerns and alleged Chinese government access to U.S. user data—claims that Berengaut successfully argued were unsubstantiated and violated TikTok’s constitutional rights.
Berengaut continued representing TikTok in 2023 when he secured a preliminary injunction blocking Montana’s statewide ban on the app—the first ruling of its kind. In that case, Covington argued successfully that the ban was unconstitutional because it shut down an entire medium for expression while failing to serve an actual government interest, and that it relied on unsubstantiated findings about Chinese government control.
Most recently, Berengaut has led Covington’s representation of TikTok in matters arising under the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, including proceedings before the D.C. Circuit and the U.S. Supreme Court—some of the most consequential technology cases of the past decade.
Beyond TikTok, Berengaut has been counsel to Microsoft in precedent-setting cases involving government surveillance, including Microsoft’s landmark challenge to the government’s attempt to compel disclosure of customer emails stored in Ireland using a search warrant, Microsoft’s First Amendment challenge in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to restrictions on disclosures about government surveillance, and Microsoft’s constitutional challenge to statutes allowing courts to impose gag orders on technology companies.
His achievements earned him recognition as Law360’s MVP in both the Cybersecurity & Privacy and Technology categories, as well as being named Litigator of the Week by multiple publications.
Megan Crowley: The DOJ Veteran Defending Tech’s Biggest Names
Megan Crowley, co-chair of Covington’s Government Litigation practice alongside Berengaut, brings formidable government experience to her representation of technology companies. A former trial lawyer at the U.S. Department of Justice, Crowley combines strategic foresight with public-sector experience in handling high-impact constitutional, statutory, and administrative law cases.
For over five years, Crowley has co-led Covington’s representation of TikTok in litigation concerning privacy, data security, and government regulation. She co-led the successful 2020 challenge to the executive order seeking to ban TikTok, and in 2023 obtained the preliminary injunction blocking Montana’s ban. Since 2024, she has continued leading TikTok’s representation in proceedings before the D.C. Circuit and the U.S. Supreme Court under the federal ban legislation.
Crowley has also achieved significant victories for other clients. She played a pivotal role in Covington’s successful representation of Xiaomi Corporation in overturning a Department of Defense designation that would have barred the company from U.S. financial markets, and has represented major global companies in administrative and appellate litigation involving data security, government regulation, and consumer protection.
Her work has earned recognition from The American Lawyer, which named her “Litigator of the Week,” and Law360, which recognized her as a Rising Star in Cybersecurity & Privacy.
Isaac Chaput and Ashley Simonsen: The Generative AI Defense Team
Partners Isaac Chaput and Ashley Simonsen have emerged as Covington’s specialists in defending cutting-edge AI privacy cases—a rapidly growing area as generative AI technologies face legal challenges around data collection and training.
In 2024, Chaput and Simonsen secured the dismissal of a first-of-its-kind generative AI privacy class action for Microsoft. The putative class action, Cousart v. OpenAI LP, asserted that OpenAI’s training of ChatGPT and other generative AI services using public data from the internet—and Microsoft’s incorporation of that technology into its services—violated the plaintiffs’ privacy and property rights. The Court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss, and plaintiffs opted not to amend their complaint.
The Daily Journal selected this victory as one of its Top Verdicts of 2024, recognizing it as among the largest and most significant verdicts in California. The case was particularly significant as the first major privacy challenge to generative AI training practices, and the dismissal set an important precedent for the industry.
Simonsen has been recognized as a Daily Journal Top 100 Lawyer in California and a Daily Journal Leading Commercial Litigator in California. Chaput was named a Daily Journal Top 100 Lawyer in California in 2025.
Chris Pistilli and the Meta Social Media Defense
Partner Chris Pistilli has led Covington’s defense of Meta in massive litigation involving over 2,000 personal injury, public nuisance, and state attorney general lawsuits filed across the country alleging that social media platforms harm youth mental health.
In 2024, Pistilli and Ashley Simonsen secured the dismissal, without leave to amend, of four “representative” school district complaints in a Judicial Council Coordinated Proceeding (JCCP) in Los Angeles Superior Court. The dismissals, which govern hundreds of school district cases pending against Meta, were recognized by the Daily Journal as one of its Top Verdicts of 2024.
The cases alleged that social media has increased the cost of education by making students more distracted and disruptive, driving up the need for classroom discipline, employee training, and communication with parents. The California state judge sided with Meta, ruling that there must be limits on liability—otherwise any company could be held responsible when emotional harm it inflicts on individuals causes those individuals to act out.
Covington serves as national lead counsel to Meta in these matters, with most cases centralized in the JCCP or in a federal multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the Northern District of California. The Covington team includes Phyllis Jones, Mike Imbroscio, and Paul Schmidt.
The Regulatory Advisors: Lindsey Tonsager, Elizabeth Canter, and Others
On the regulatory and advisory side, Covington’s practice features attorneys who help technology companies navigate the complex web of privacy regulations before litigation arises.
Lindsey Tonsager, a partner based in San Francisco, focuses on regulatory data privacy matters including advising on the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), particularly as they relate to newly developed technologies. She has been recognized as a Daily Journal Top AI Lawyer in California and a Daily Journal Top Cyber Lawyer.
Elizabeth Canter, a partner in Washington, D.C., advises clients on managing risks under federal and state data privacy and communications laws, including privacy-by-design strategies and third-party risk management. She regularly represents clients in commercial transactions involving personal data and cyber issues, and advises businesses on compliance with laws governing health-related data. Chambers USA recognizes Canter for her “burgeoning privacy and cybersecurity practice,” noting she “attracts extensive praise.”
Daniel Cooper, co-chair of Covington’s global Data Privacy & Cybersecurity Practice based in Brussels, leads the firm’s European data protection practice. With 35 lawyers across Brussels, Frankfurt, London, and Johannesburg, the EMEA team has advised multinational companies on national and regional data privacy laws for over 25 years.
James Garland, another key partner, brings his background from working at the Department of Justice to bear in data access disputes concerning national security and rights to protect data. Chambers notes that “James has excellent judgment, responsiveness and the quality of his work is strong.”
Recent Landmark Victories: Apple, Microsoft, and Meta
Covington’s recent track record demonstrates why it’s become the premier defense firm for technology companies facing privacy challenges.
The Apple Privacy Victory (January 2026)
On January 20, 2026, Covington secured a major victory for Apple when a California federal court dismissed claims under the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) in In Re: Apple Data Priv. Litig. The lawsuit alleged that Apple misled users into believing that disabling data collection settings would prevent Apple’s proprietary, in-house apps from collecting data on their personal information and app activity, when in fact Apple continued the collection.
The case was brought by Lynch Carpenter LLP and Bursor & Fisher PA—the same plaintiffs’ firms pursuing data breach class actions across the country that we’ve released warnings about to businesses who are not compliant and providing them details on how we can protect them against these claims by using our industry leading data privacy software tools (think cookie consent banners, auto-updating privacy notices, dynamic cookie policies, data subject rights request tools, and more). Covington’s defense team successfully defeated these claims, protecting Apple from what could have been massive class action liability.
The Microsoft/OpenAI Generative AI Dismissal
The Cousart v. OpenAI LP dismissal represented a watershed moment for the generative AI industry. The case raised fundamental questions about whether using publicly available internet data to train AI models violates privacy laws—an issue that could affect every AI company’s business model.
The plaintiffs argued that OpenAI’s scraping of data from the internet for training ChatGPT, and Microsoft’s incorporation of that technology, violated their privacy and property rights under California law. Covington’s successful defense not only protected Microsoft but established important precedent for the entire generative AI sector.
Judge Vince Chhabria, who presided over related AI copyright cases, has shown willingness to dismiss privacy claims that lack concrete allegations of harm—a principle Covington has leveraged effectively.
The Meta Social Media Litigation
Covington’s ongoing defense of Meta in the sprawling social media addiction litigation represents one of the most complex mass tort defenses in recent memory. With over 2,000 cases consolidated in state and federal proceedings, and 974 actions pending in MDL No. 3047 as of January 2026, the litigation poses existential risks for social media platforms.
The cases come in multiple forms: personal injury suits by youths and families alleging psychological distress and suicides, public nuisance claims by school districts seeking to recover costs for addressing negative impacts of student social media use, and enforcement actions by state attorneys general alleging deceptive trade practices.
Covington has achieved several critical victories:
School District Dismissals: In June 2024, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Carolyn Kuhl dismissed school district claims against Meta, Snap, TikTok, and Google, ruling that the districts’ allegations that social media increased education costs were insufficient. The court found that allowing such claims would create unlimited liability where any company could be held responsible when emotional harm causes individuals to act out.
Partial Section 230 Protections: In October 2024, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers allowed some claims to proceed while dismissing others under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Covington successfully argued that many of the claims seek to treat Meta as a publisher of third-party content and thus fall within Section 230’s protections.
Strategic Case Management: Covington has effectively managed the enormous complexity of defending thousands of cases simultaneously, coordinating joint defense strategies with other social media companies while preserving Meta’s individual interests.
The litigation remains ongoing, but Covington’s strategic victories have significantly narrowed the scope of potential liability and established important legal precedents about the limits of social media platform accountability.
The Broader Practice: Compliance, Investigations, and Transactions
Beyond high-profile litigation, Covington’s privacy practice provides comprehensive services across the entire lifecycle of privacy and cybersecurity challenges.
Incident Response and Breach Management
Covington has assisted clients in responding to scores of cybersecurity incidents, from security breaches perpetrated by inside actors to sophisticated external attacks involving millions of customer and employee records. The firm has handled several of the largest cyber-related financial crimes on record.
The firm’s cybersecurity practice has “unsurpassed experience addressing the most significant cybersecurity matters confronted by commercial enterprises,” according to its practice description. Unlike many firms that treat cybersecurity as simply a subset of privacy, Covington approaches it as a distinct practice area with specialized expertise.
Regulatory Compliance and Government Investigations
Covington regularly works with multinational companies on compliance with an array of privacy regulations:
- GDPR and European Data Protection: The EMEA team advises on compliance with EU data protection rules, including navigating the implications of the Schrems II decision on cross-border data transfers.
- U.S. Federal Laws: Including the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLB), Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA), Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), HIPAA, and the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA).
- State Privacy Laws: Including the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), and emerging state privacy statutes in Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, Utah, and other states.
- Sector-Specific Regulations: Financial privacy, health privacy, and telecommunications privacy requirements.
Two of Covington’s lawyers led implementation teams for key rulemaking proceedings at the Federal Reserve Board and Federal Trade Commission during the development of comprehensive financial privacy rules. The firm has been involved in privacy regulation from the earliest stages, including assisting with drafting key legislation.
Cross-Border Data Transfers
Covington maintains a specialized practice focused on cross-border data transfer issues, helping multinational companies navigate the complex patchwork of international data transfer requirements. The firm advises on Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs), Binding Corporate Rules (BCRs), adequacy decisions, and other transfer mechanisms under GDPR and other international frameworks.
Privacy in Transactions
Covington’s privacy attorneys regularly advise on privacy and cybersecurity issues in corporate transactions, including:
- Due diligence on data privacy and security practices of acquisition targets
- Negotiating representations, warranties, and indemnities related to privacy compliance
- Structuring data transfers and processing arrangements post-acquisition
- Addressing regulatory approval requirements for transactions involving personal data
Legislative and Regulatory Advocacy
Covington’s privacy practice works hand-in-hand with its renowned public policy practice to shape emerging privacy legislation and regulations. The firm advocates on behalf of clients before Congress, state legislatures, the FTC, state attorneys general, and international regulatory bodies.
This advocacy work includes engaging with government and other stakeholders, drafting submissions in connection with public consultations, preparing white papers on behalf of clients, and providing strategic advice on how to influence the development of new privacy frameworks.
The Firm’s Track Record: Awards and Recognition
Covington’s privacy practice has earned consistent recognition as one of the elite practices in the field:
- Law360 Cybersecurity & Privacy Group of the Year (2021)
- Law360 Technology Practice Group of the Year (2019, 2020, 2021)
- Law360 Compliance Practice Group of the Year (2020-2024)
- Global Data Review “GDR 100 Elite” (2023-2024)
- African Legal Awards “TMT Team of the Year” (2023)
- Chambers USA – Leading Data Protection Practice (2013-2025)
- Chambers Global – Leading Data Protection Practice (2013-2025)
- Chambers Europe – Leading Data Protection Practice (2014-2025)
- Chambers UK – Leading Data Protection Practice (2013-2026)
- Legal 500 EMEA – Leading EU Regulatory, Privacy and Data Protection Practice (2013-2025)
- Legal 500 UK – Leading Data Protection Practice (2013-2026)
Individual attorneys have been recognized as well, with numerous partners ranked in Chambers as leading privacy practitioners, named as Law360 MVPs in Cybersecurity & Privacy, and selected for Daily Journal’s Top Cyber Lawyers lists.
The Inside Privacy Blog: Thought Leadership and Market Intelligence
Covington maintains “Inside Privacy,” one of the most widely-read and influential blogs in the privacy space. The blog, written by the firm’s data security lawyers, provides regular updates on privacy law developments, regulatory actions, court decisions, and emerging trends.
The blog has been named to the ABA Journal’s “Blawg 100” list multiple times, recognizing it as one of the 100 best legal blogs in the country. For companies trying to stay ahead of privacy developments, Inside Privacy serves as essential reading—and a window into how Covington’s lawyers are thinking about cutting-edge issues.
Recent blog posts have covered topics including:
- Germany’s transposition of the NIS 2 Directive with increased cybersecurity requirements
- FTC consent orders with companies that experienced cybersecurity incidents
- NIST’s Cybersecurity Framework Profile for Artificial Intelligence
- California Attorney General settlements under the CCPA
- CISA’s release of Cybersecurity Performance Goals 2.0 for critical infrastructure
- State-level privacy legislation developments
The blog demonstrates Covington’s commitment to thought leadership and its ability to translate complex regulatory developments into practical guidance for clients.
A 2020-2021 Cyberattack: The Firm’s Own Privacy Challenge
Ironically, even the elite privacy defense firm wasn’t immune to cybersecurity challenges. In 2020, Covington itself fell victim to a sophisticated cyberattack involving a Chinese state-sponsored hacker exploiting a zero-day vulnerability in Microsoft’s Exchange Server software.
The hack, which began in November 2020, compromised Covington’s systems before Microsoft discovered the vulnerability in March 2021. The incident led to an unprecedented legal battle with the SEC, which demanded that Covington provide the names of nearly 300 affected clients—all U.S.-listed companies or investment advisors—to investigate potential insider trading concerns.
Covington refused, arguing that the SEC’s subpoena violated attorney-client privilege and would turn “advocate into informant.” The firm engaged in an extensive internal review involving nine attorneys and nearly 500 hours of attorney time, concluding that only seven of the 298 impacted clients might possibly have had material nonpublic information (MNPI) compromised.
The SEC sued Covington in January 2023, leading to a closely-watched case that drew support from over 80 of the most influential law firms in the country, which filed briefs defending Covington and arguing that the SEC’s attempts would undermine attorney-client privilege and the cooperative relationship between the public and private sector.
The case demonstrated the complexity of privacy obligations when law firms themselves are breached, and highlighted the tensions between cybersecurity disclosure requirements, attorney-client privilege, and government investigative powers.
The Strategic Value of Covington’s Privacy Defense
For technology companies facing privacy litigation or regulatory challenges, Covington offers several strategic advantages that few other firms can match:
1. Government Relationships and Former Government Attorneys: The firm’s roster includes former attorneys general, former DOJ prosecutors, former SEC officials, and former regulatory agency staff. These connections provide insights into government thinking and credibility when making arguments to regulators and judges.
2. Technical Sophistication: Covington’s attorneys understand complex technology systems, AI training methodologies, data architectures, and cybersecurity practices at a level that allows them to effectively defend technical challenges.
3. Cross-Disciplinary Integration: Privacy cases often implicate antitrust issues, securities regulation, consumer protection, telecommunications law, and other specialized areas. Covington can seamlessly integrate expertise from across the firm.
4. Global Reach: With offices spanning the U.S., Europe, Middle East, Africa, and Asia, and attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions, Covington can coordinate privacy defense strategies across borders.
5. Experience with Novel Legal Questions: Many of Covington’s cases involve issues of first impression—from AI training liability to government surveillance powers to social media addiction claims. The firm excels at developing winning arguments in uncharted legal territory.
6. Strategic Settlement and Trial Capabilities: While Covington has achieved numerous dismissals, the firm is equally capable of negotiating favorable settlements when appropriate or taking cases to trial when necessary.
How Covington’s Defense Practice Impacts the Privacy Landscape
Covington’s work defending technology companies has had profound impacts on the development of privacy law:
Setting Precedents on Platform Liability: The firm’s defenses of Meta, TikTok, and other platforms in Section 230 cases have helped define the boundaries of when internet companies can be held liable for third-party content and platform features.
Shaping AI Privacy Standards: The dismissal of the Microsoft/OpenAI privacy case established early precedent that training AI on publicly available data doesn’t automatically violate privacy laws—a critical principle for the AI industry.
Limiting Government Surveillance Powers: Covington’s Microsoft representations have resulted in significant reforms to government surveillance practices and stronger protections for technology users’ data from government access.
Defining Limits of Privacy Litigation: The school district dismissals in the Meta social media cases established important principles about the limits of derivative liability and the types of economic harms that can support privacy claims.
Influencing Regulatory Frameworks: Through its advocacy work, Covington has shaped the development of privacy regulations to be more workable for technology companies while still protecting consumer interests.
The Plaintiff-Defense Dynamic: Two Sides of the Privacy Bar
The contrast between firms like Lynch Carpenter on the plaintiff side and Covington on the defense side illustrates the two poles of privacy litigation:
Plaintiffs’ firms like Lynch Carpenter excel at rapidly identifying breaches, recruiting class members, and filing complaints that leverage favorable legal precedents and public outrage over privacy violations. Their business model depends on volume, speed, and the ability to extract settlements by threatening massive exposure.
Defense firms like Covington excel at defeating claims through sophisticated legal arguments, leveraging government relationships, and handling complex procedural battles that can take years to resolve. Their business model depends on securing dismissals, narrowing the scope of liability, and when necessary, negotiating settlements that minimize financial and reputational damage.
The dynamic creates an ongoing legal arms race. As plaintiffs’ firms develop new theories of liability and more aggressive recruitment strategies, defense firms must develop innovative arguments and defenses. As courts issue new rulings favorable to plaintiffs, defense firms must find ways to distinguish their clients’ situations or narrow the precedents.
For companies caught between these forces, the choice of defense counsel can be existential. A firm that lacks Covington’s combination of technical expertise, government relationships, and experience with novel legal questions may struggle to mount an effective defense against sophisticated plaintiffs’ firms backed by favorable precedents and sympathetic plaintiffs.
The Future of Privacy Defense
Looking ahead, Covington’s privacy practice is well-positioned for the challenges technology companies will face:
AI and Machine Learning Litigation: As AI technologies continue to evolve, more litigation will challenge training practices, algorithmic decision-making, and AI-generated outputs. Covington’s early victory in the Microsoft/OpenAI case provides a foundation for defending future AI privacy claims.
Biometric Privacy Expansion: As more states enact biometric privacy laws similar to Illinois’s BIPA, companies will face increasing litigation over facial recognition, fingerprint scanning, and other biometric technologies. Covington’s experience defending novel privacy claims positions it well for this emerging area.
State Privacy Law Enforcement: With comprehensive privacy laws now enacted in over a dozen states, and state attorneys general increasingly aggressive in enforcement, companies will need sophisticated defense strategies. Covington’s experience defending against state AG actions and navigating conflicting state requirements will be increasingly valuable.
International Privacy Challenges: As countries around the world enact data localization requirements, cross-border transfer restrictions, and unique privacy frameworks, multinational technology companies will need firms with true global capabilities.
Regulatory Investigations and Enforcement: The FTC, SEC, state attorneys general, and international regulators are all ramping up privacy enforcement. Covington’s experience navigating government investigations and its relationships with regulators will become even more critical.
Covington Law – The Gold Standard in Privacy Defense
If you’re a Fortune 1000 company or rather a Fortune 50 company you think of Covington as the go to company for privacy defense in the court room and you think of Captain Compliance as your solution for privacy software. If you don’t think of these two names then you should now. For technology companies facing privacy litigation, regulatory investigations, or compliance challenges, Covington & Burling represents the gold standard in legal representation. The firm’s combination of government expertise, technical sophistication, global reach, and track record of victories in high-stakes cases is unmatched.
While plaintiffs’ firms like Lynch Carpenter, Gutride Safier, Levi & Korsinsky, and Pacific Trial Attorneys have built profitable practices by pursuing companies over privacy violations, Covington has built an equally impressive practice by defending those companies against existential threats. The firm doesn’t just win individual cases it shapes the legal frameworks that govern privacy law’s application to new technologies.
As privacy litigation continues to grow, as new technologies raise novel legal questions, and as governments worldwide impose increasingly complex regulatory requirements, companies that invest in top-tier privacy defense counsel like Covington are making strategic decisions about their survival. In a legal landscape where a single adverse ruling can expose companies to billions in liability, where regulatory investigations can threaten business models, and where public opinion can shift overnight, having the best defense team isn’t a luxury it’s a necessity.
For organizations seeking to understand the privacy litigation landscape, studying Covington’s strategies, arguments, and victories provides essential insights into how the most sophisticated defense is conducted. And for companies facing their own privacy challenges, Covington’s track record makes clear why the world’s leading technology companies consistently choose the firm to defend their most important battles.
